-
1.
Effect of Fructooligosaccharides Supplementation on the Gut Microbiota in Human: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dou, Y, Yu, X, Luo, Y, Chen, B, Ma, D, Zhu, J
Nutrients. 2022;14(16)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fructooligosaccharide is a prebiotic fibre that undergoes fermentation in the gut, due to which it can cause gas and bloat. Additionally, this prebiotic fibre ferments to produce short-chain fatty acids, which are beneficial for the body. This systematic review and meta-analysis included eight randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of fructooligosaccharide on gut microbial composition. Short-term supplementation with fructooligosaccharide altered the gut’s microbial composition without causing any adverse effects. Bifidobacterium spp. levels were elevated in those who consumed fructooligosaccharide supplements than those who did not. Supplementation with fructooligosaccharide did not significantly change harmful bacteria such as Bacteroides and Enterobacteriaceae levels. In addition, a higher dosage of 7.5–15 g/d of fructooligosaccharide supplementation for a period of more than four weeks was found to be beneficial. Healthcare professionals can use these results to understand better how fructooligosaccharide modulates beneficial gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp. However, there is a need for more robust studies since the number of currently available studies is limited, and the exact health implications of fructooligosaccharide supplementation need to be evaluated further.
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have investigated the effects of the supplementation of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) on the number of bacteria in the gut that are good for health, but the results have been inconsistent. Additionally, due to its high fermentability, supplementation of FOS may be associated with adverse gastrointestinal symptoms such as bloating and flatulence. Therefore, we assessed the effects of FOS interventions on the composition of gut microbiota and gastrointestinal symptoms in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Design: All randomized controlled trials published before 10 July 2022 that investigated the effects of FOS supplementation on the human gut microbiota composition and gastrointestinal symptoms and met the selection criteria were included in this study. Using fixed or random-effects models, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the two groups before and after the intervention were combined into weighted mean differences using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eight studies containing 213 FOS supplements and 175 controls remained in this meta-analysis. Bifidobacterium spp. counts significantly increased during FOS ingestion (0.579, 95% CI: 0.444-0.714) in comparison with that of the control group. Subgroup analysis showed greater variation in Bifidobacterium spp. in adults (0.861, 95% CI: 0.614-1.108) than in infants (0.458, 95% CI: 0.297-0.619). The increase in Bifidobacterium spp. counts were greater in the group with an intervention duration greater than 4 weeks (0.841, 95% CI: 0.436-1.247) than an intervention time less than or equal to four weeks (0.532, 95% CI: 0.370-0.694), and in the group with intervention doses > 5 g (1.116, 95% CI: 0.685-1.546) the counts were higher than those with doses ≤ 5 g (0.521, 95% CI: 0.379-0.663). No differences in effect were found between FOS intervention and comparators in regard to the abundance of other prespecified bacteria or adverse gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to explore the effect of FOS on gut microbiota and to evaluate the adverse effects of FOS intake on the gastrointestinal tract. FOS supplementation could increase the number of colonic Bifidobacterium spp. while higher dose (7.5-15 g/d) and longer duration (>4 weeks) showed more distinct effects and was well tolerated.
-
2.
A Low-FODMAP Diet Provides Benefits for Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms but Not for Improving Stool Consistency and Mucosal Inflammation in IBD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Peng, Z, Yi, J, Liu, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(10)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The low-FODMAP diet eliminates carbohydrates that cannot be easily digested in order to reduce functional gastrointestinal symptoms associated with irritable bowel disease (IBD). The symptoms of irritable bowel disease include abdominal pain and bloating. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether a low-FODMAP diet can alleviate functional gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. In comparison with a regular diet, a low-FODMAP diet significantly reduced symptoms of bloating, wind, flatulence, abdominal pain, fatigue, and lethargy in patients with IBD. In addition, patients with Crohn's disease have achieved remission or reduced symptoms after following a low-FODMAP diet. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand better the effects of a low-FODMAP diet on patients with IBD who have functional gastrointestinal symptoms. Further robust studies are, however, required to evaluate the evidence's robustness and identify the mechanism behind the improvement of symptoms.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- LFD use in IBD improved symptoms of bloating, wind or flatulence, borborygmi, abdominal pain, and fatigue or lethargy, but not nausea and vomiting.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (UC)] participants with functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs).
Methods
A search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang (Chinese) Database up to March 2022. Quality assessment of all included studies was performed.
Results
9 studies (4 randomised controlled trials, 5 non-randomised studies) with a total of 351 participants diagnosed with IBD were included, and compared LFD with a placebo diet or normal diet (ND), overall and individual
LFD Effects of FGS:
- Overall 9 studies: an improvement (0.47, 0.33–0.66, p = 0.0000)
- No difference in the subgroup classified by disease type
- CD and UC: no improvement
Individual improvement:
- Bloating (0.37, 0,24-0,57, p=0.0000); wind or flatulence (0.38, 0,28-0,51, p=0.0000); borborygmi (0.48, 0,26-0,89, p=0.0000), abdominal pain (0.5, 0,37-0,68, p=0.0000), fatigue/lethargy (0.71, 0,61-0,82, p=0.0000)
- No difference in nausea and vomiting (0.54, 0,22-1,32, p=018)
IBS Quality of Life Score:
- 2 studies: reduced Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ) score (11.24, 6.61-15.87, p=0.0000)
Bristol Stool Form Chart:
- 2 studies: normal stool consistency (type 3-4); no difference (5.99, 0.17-216.51, p=0.33)
- 2 other studies: no difference (-0.17, 0.48 - 0.15, p=0.30)
Diseases activity (Harvey-Bradshaw index):
- 2 studies using the Mayo score: no difference (-32, -1,09-0.45, p=0.41)
- 3 studies using BHi score: reduction (-1.09, -1,77-0.42, p=0.002)
Faecal calprotectin:
- 2 studies: no change (-16.03, -36,78-4.73, p=0.13)
Limitations
- Comparison diets were not standardised, suggesting the potential of different dietary habits to bias results..
- Heterogeneity of included studies, and the relatively small sample size of the studies can reduce the reliability of the results.
Conclusion
While the study found inconsistent definition standards for FGS, all the nine studies showed that LFD was associated with an improvement in some symptoms.
Clinical practice applications:
- This study suggests that IBD patients with FGSs may benefit from LFD treatment with the assistance of a healthcare professional.
Considerations for future research:
- This study has shown that LFD can improve FGSs in IBD, but further research with a larger sample size and more comprehensive analysis is warranted to replicate the results.
- The description of the findings and Quality of Life data are a little unclear. The impact on Quality of Life warrants further investigation, as clinicians need to consider the impact of following a restrictive diet on Quality of Life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND A low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) is claimed to improve functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs). However, the role of LFD in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with FGSs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To systematically assess the efficacy of LFD in IBD patients with FGSs. METHODS Six databases were searched from inception to 1 January 2022. Data were synthesized as the relative risk of symptoms improvement and normal stool consistency, mean difference of Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ), IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QoL), Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBi), Mayo score, and fecal calprotectin (FC). Risk of bias was assessed based on study types. A funnel plot and Egger's test were used to analyze publication bias. RESULTS This review screened and included nine eligible studies, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five before-after studies, involving a total of 446 participants (351 patients with LFD vs. 95 controls). LFD alleviated overall FGSs (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66, p = 0.0000) and obtained higher SIBDQ scores (MD = 11.24, 95% CI 6.61 to 15.87, p = 0.0000) and lower HBi score of Crohn's disease (MD = -1.09, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.42, p = 0.002). However, there were no statistically significant differences in normal stool consistency, BSFS, IBS-QoL, Mayo score of ulcerative colitis, and FC. No publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS LFD provides a benefit in FGSs and QoL but not for improving stool consistency and mucosal inflammation in IBD patients. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to develop the optimal LFD strategy for IBD.
-
3.
Association of Migraine with Its Comorbidities and Food Specific Immunoglobulin G Antibodies and Inflammatory Cytokines: Cross-Sectional Clinical Research.
Zhao, Z, Jin, H, Yin, Y, Hou, Y, Wang, J, Tang, C, Fu, J
Journal of pain research. 2021;14:2359-2368
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Migraine is a chronic, multifactorial headache with multiple comorbid conditions. Previous studies have shown a correlation between food-specific IgG antibodies and chronic inflammation in migraineurs. IgG antibody detection may therefore be a biomarker for migraine since it plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease. This cross-sectional clinical trial investigated the relationship between IgG antibodies against food antigens and headaches, gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, dermatosis and inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNFα, and IL-10. In this study, migraine patients who had positive food-specific IgG antibodies had severe migraine, anxiety, gastrointestinal symptoms, and elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNFα, indicating a causal relationship. However, further studies are required to determine the immune reaction to food antigens and the effect of eliminating IgG positive foods on migraine and its associated comorbidities. Nevertheless, this study can help healthcare professionals understand how food-specific antibodies play a role in diagnosing and treating migraine.
Abstract
PURPOSE The relationship between food allergy caused by food specific IgG antibodies and migraine has received increased attention in recent years. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of food specific IgG antibodies on headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, dermatosis, and serum inflammatory cytokines in migraine patients, and to quantitatively assess the effect of IgG levels on the severity of headache and its comorbidities. METHODS Of 89 migraine patients, those who had one or more food specific IgG antibodies ≥50 U/mL were classified into the IgG positive group, which was then further divided into subgroups based on differing numbers of food allergens. All other subjects were classified into the IgG negative group. We compared the frequency and severity of migraine, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, dermatosis, and inflammatory cytokines between groups. A regression model was performed to further assess the effect of overall positive IgG concentration and the mediation effect of inflammatory cytokines. RESULTS Participants in the positive IgG group (n = 67) were more likely to have longer time elapsed since diagnosis, more frequent and severe migraine, a higher risk of developing anxiety and gastrointestinal symptoms, along with higher IL-6 and TNF-α. Subgroups with more food allergens generally had worse conditions as well. After adjusting for the inflammatory cytokines, the effect of IgG was reduced. CONCLUSION Migraine patients with positive food specific IgG antibodies had worse migraine, anxiety, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Inflammatory cytokines partially mediate the causal pathway between food specific IgG antibodies, migraine, and migraine comorbidities.
-
4.
Evidence on Human Exposure to Pesticides and the Occurrence of Health Hazards in the Brazilian Population: A Systematic Review.
Panis, C, Kawassaki, ACB, Crestani, APJ, Pascotto, CR, Bortoloti, DS, Vicentini, GE, Lucio, LC, Ferreira, MO, Prates, RTC, Vieira, VK, et al
Frontiers in public health. 2021;9:787438
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The use of pesticides to eradicate pests is a common agricultural practice. Between 2009 and 2019, Brazilians used more chemicals to eradicate weeds, fungi, and insects. Brazil is a heavy user of pesticides, but their toxic effects, including their health and environmental effects, have not been well studied. A total of 44 studies are included in this systematic review. There is a link between pesticide exposure and neurological damage, cancer, gastrointestinal issues, poisoning, hormonal irregularities, and malformations in children, according to the studies included in this review. The systematic review shows that pesticides are toxic to both rural and urban workers regardless of their age and gender. For a comprehensive assessment of pesticides' toxic effects on the environment and human health, more robust research is needed. Despite this, healthcare professionals can use the research findings to identify pesticide health impacts and make informed clinical decisions.
Abstract
Brazil is among the biggest pesticide consumers in the world, with its population severely exposed to tons of such substances, both because of environmental contamination and occupational use. The health consequences of pesticide exposure are well-documented, but still sparse regarding Brazilian population. This study systematically reviewed the Brazilian studies published that address the relationship between exposure to pesticides and health problems in the Brazilian population. Also, information about pesticide use in Brazil is provided. The included studies showed that exposure to pesticides has a relevant impact on the health of the Brazilian population, regardless of age and gender, and on workers in rural areas or not. Most poisoning events seem to result from the continuous use of pesticides, whether occupationally or environmentally, characterizing a public health problem. The major consequences reported in literature were damage to the central nervous system, cancer, deleterious effects on rural workers' health, intoxications, malformations, and endocrine changes. These findings point out the need to understand the impact of chronic exposure to pesticides on severely exposed people and highlight the importance of creating public policies to protect them and avoid disease occurrence.
-
5.
Gastric emptying of solutions containing the natural sweetener erythritol and effects on gut hormone secretion in humans: A pilot dose-ranging study.
Wölnerhanssen, BK, Drewe, J, Verbeure, W, le Roux, CW, Dellatorre-Teixeira, L, Rehfeld, JF, Holst, JJ, Hartmann, B, Tack, J, Peterli, R, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2021;23(6):1311-1321
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
In recent years, erythritol, a non-calorie sweetener, has gained popularity due to the rise in obesity and Type 2 diabetes worldwide. The purpose of this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial was to assess the effects of erythritol on the release of gut hormones, speed of gastric emptying, and the release of glucagon, motilin, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide after erythritol administration. Erythritol in doses of ten, twenty-five, and fifty grams was well tolerated by the participants. The administration of erythritol induced a statistically significant dose-dependent stimulation of gut hormones such as plasma cholecystokinin, active glucagon‐like peptide‐1 and peptide tyrosine. Compared to the placebo, participants had slower gastric emptying with erythritol. Erythritol had no effect on the levels of motilin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, blood glucose, insulin, glucagon, blood lipids, or uric acid. Erythritol should be evaluated in larger, robust studies to determine whether it improves glycaemic control. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the potential uses of erythritol in the management of obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Abstract
AIM: To determine whether a dose-dependent effect in the stimulation of gut hormone release (plasma cholecystokinin [CCK], active glucagon-like peptide-1 [aGLP-1] and peptide tyrosine tyrosine [PYY]) is found for the natural sweetener erythritol. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve healthy, lean volunteers received solutions with 10, 25 or 50 g erythritol, or tap water enriched with 13 C-sodium acetate on four study days via a nasogastric tube in this randomized (active treatments), placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial. Blood samples and breath samples (13 C-sodium acetate method for measurement of gastric emptying [GE]) were taken at regular intervals, and sensations of appetite and gastrointestinal symptoms were rated. RESULTS We found (a) a dose-dependent stimulation of CCK, aGLP-1 and PYY, and slowing of GE, (b) no effect on blood glucose, insulin, motilin, glucagon or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, (c) no effect on blood lipids and uric acid, and (d) no abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting. CONCLUSIONS Solutions with 10 and 50 g of erythritol stimulated gut hormone release. Emptying of erythritol-containing solutions from the stomach was slower compared with placebo. There was no effect on plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, blood lipids or uric acid. All doses were well tolerated.
-
6.
Efficacy of Zemedy, a Mobile Digital Therapeutic for the Self-management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hunt, M, Miguez, S, Dukas, B, Onwude, O, White, S
JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2021;9(5):e26152
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a proven treatment method to tackle many psychiatric issues. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is considered a chronic gastrointestinal disorder with psychiatric comorbidity. However, patients find it difficult to access CBT for IBS management. As per previous research findings, web-based and telephone-based CBT, self-help CBT books and CBT treatment manuals offer promising therapeutic effects in improving IBS. Therefore, this crossover randomised controlled trial aimed to look at the efficacy of Zemedy, a mobile digital therapeutic application that provides a comprehensive CBT programme to IBS patients. This study found that Zemedy is an effective modality that increases access to effective CBT treatment for IBS patients. Results showed significant improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms, irritable bowel syndrome quality of life, gastrointestinal cognition, visceral sensitivity, fear of food, depression, and improved health-related quality of life in 62 IBS patients enrolled in the immediate treatment group. Further robust studies are required to determine the efficacy of digital applications in IBS patients with significantly higher psychiatric comorbidity. Healthcare practitioners can use the results of the study to understand the importance of digital applications and make them part of intervention strategies.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) experience abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, and defecation-related anxiety, which can result in reduced productivity and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to reduce symptoms of IBS and to improve HRQL, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Smartphone-based digital therapeutic interventions have potential to increase access to guided CBT at scale, but require careful study to assess their benefits and risks. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a novel app, Zemedy, as a mobile digital therapeutic that delivers a comprehensive CBT program to individuals with IBS. METHODS This was a crossover randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited online and randomly allocated to either immediate treatment (n=62) or waitlist control (n=59) groups. The Zemedy app consists of 8 modules focusing on psychoeducation, relaxation training, exercise, the cognitive model of stress management, applying CBT to IBS symptoms, reducing avoidance through exposure therapy, behavioral experiments, and information about diet. Users interact with a chatbot that presents the information and encourages specific plans, homework, and exercises. The treatment was fully automated, with no therapist involvement or communication. At baseline and after 8 weeks, participants were asked to complete the battery of primary (Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life [IBS-QOL], Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale [GSRS]) and secondary (Fear of Food Questionnaire [FFQ], Visceral Sensitivity Index [VSI], Gastrointestinal Cognition Questionnaire [GI-COG], Depression Anxiety Stress Scale [DASS], and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) outcome measures. Waitlist controls were then offered the opportunity to crossover to treatment. All participants were assessed once more at 3 months posttreatment. RESULTS Both intention-to-treat and completer analyses at posttreatment revealed significant improvement for the immediate treatment group compared to the waitlist control group on both primary and secondary outcome measures. Gains were generally maintained at 3 months posttreatment. Scores on the GSRS, IBS-QoL, GI-COG, VSI, and FFQ all improved significantly more in the treatment group (F1,79=20.49, P<.001, Cohen d=1.01; F1,79=20.12, P<.001, d=1.25; F1,79=34.71, P<.001, d=1.47; F1,79=18.7, P<.001, d=1.07; and F1,79=12.13, P=.001, d=0.62, respectively). Depression improved significantly as measured by the PHQ-9 (F1,79=10.5, P=.002, d=1.07), and the DASS Depression (F1,79=6.03, P=.02, d=.83) and Stress (F1,79=4.47, P=.04, d=0.65) subscales in the completer analysis but not in the intention-to-treat analysis. The impact of treatment on HRQL was mediated by reductions in catastrophizing and visceral sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Despite its relatively benign physical profile, IBS can be an extraordinarily debilitating condition. Zemedy is an effective modality to deliver CBT for individuals with IBS, and could increase accessibility of this evidence-based treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04170686; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04170686.
-
7.
Is perceived intolerance to milk and wheat associated with the corresponding IgG and IgA food antibodies? A cross sectional study in subjects with morbid obesity and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Kvehaugen, AS, Tveiten, D, Farup, PG
BMC gastroenterology. 2018;18(1):22
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dairy and gluten are the most common triggers of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the general population. Food intolerance is generally detected by IgG antibodies, but the test is controversial. In this cross-sectional study, 97 obese subjects (82.4% women) were included, of which 72.1% had gastrointestinal symptoms, 35.7% had IBS, 31.4% had symptoms of milk intolerance, 28.6% had symptoms of wheat intolerance, and 15.7% had symptoms of intolerance to both milk and wheat. The study examined the association between IgA and IgG antibodies corresponding to milk and wheat in subjects with and without gastrointestinal issues and with and without perceptions of food sensitivity. The results of this study found no association between s-IgG and s-IgA antibodies and perceived food intolerances to milk and wheat among morbidly obese subjects. Although IgA against gliadin correlated with increased levels of zonulin, a marker of intestinal permeability, tight-junctional gut permeability inversely correlated with wheat intolerance. Furthermore, the study results revealed a significant correlation between hypothyroidism and IgG against wheat and a marginal correlation between hypothyroidism and IgG against gluten. Further robust research is needed to confirm these findings. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the current developments and the controversy surrounding food intolerance testing.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum IgG and IgA food antibodies have been used for dietary advice to subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms and perceived food intolerance, but the role of these antibodies in mediating intolerance is controversial. The present study investigated associations between perceived gastrointestinal intolerance to milk-or wheat and the corresponding s-IgG and s-IgA food antibodies in subjects with morbid obesity. METHODS Subjects with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related complications) were included. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) was diagnosed based on the Rome III criteria. Severity of specific gastrointestinal symptoms were measured with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)-IBS. S-IgG against cow's milk, cheese, wheat and gluten, and s-IgA against casein and gliadin were measured. RESULTS Ninety-seven subjects (80 females) with mean age 45 (SD 8.4) years were included, 70 had gastrointestinal complaints, 25 had IBS, and 22 and 20 reported milk- and wheat- intolerance respectively. There were no significant differences in serum concentrations or proportions of subjects above defined cut-off values for the antibodies between subjects with and without gastrointestinal complaints. In the group with gastrointestinal complaints, no significant differences were found between subjects with and without perceived food intolerance. Except for a significant correlation between IgG against cheese and GSRS-diarrhea (Rho: -0.25, P = 0.04), no significant correlations were found between the antibodies and type or degree of gastrointestinal symptoms, including IBS. CONCLUSIONS The study showed no associations between perceived milk or wheat intolerance and the corresponding s-IgG and s-IgA food antibodies in subjects with morbid obesity.
-
8.
Systematic review: probiotics in the management of lower gastrointestinal symptoms - an updated evidence-based international consensus.
Hungin, APS, Mitchell, CR, Whorwell, P, Mulligan, C, Cole, O, Agréus, L, Fracasso, P, Lionis, C, Mendive, J, Philippart de Foy, JM, et al
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2018;47(8):1054-1070
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The role of the gut microbiota in health and disease is far reaching and there is a growing body of evidence on the therapeutic potential of probiotics in gastrointestinal (GI) disease. Patients with GI disease present with a variety of symptoms and current evidence suggests probiotics may play a role in ameliorating these adverse symptoms. The purpose of this review is to update the previous systematic review and incorporate new findings on the role of probiotics in adult patients presenting with a variety of GI symptoms. Based on the updated evidence, this study confirms the finding that specific probiotics are beneficial for certain lower GI problems. According to this review, the author deems this study useful for clinicians when recommending probiotics to patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, a systematic review and Delphi consensus reported that specific probiotics can benefit adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other gastrointestinal (GI) problems. AIM: To update the consensus with new evidence. METHODS A systematic review identified randomised, placebo-controlled trials published between January 2012 and June 2017. Evidence was graded, previously developed statements were reassessed by an 8-expert panel, and agreement was reached via Delphi consensus. RESULTS A total of 70 studies were included (IBS, 34; diarrhoea associated with antibiotics, 13; diarrhoea associated with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, 7; other conditions, 16). Of 15 studies that examined global IBS symptoms as a primary endpoint, 8 reported significant benefits of probiotics vs placebo. Consensus statements with 100% agreement and "high" evidence level indicated that specific probiotics help reduce overall symptom burden and abdominal pain in some patients with IBS and duration/intensity of diarrhoea in patients prescribed antibiotics or H. pylori eradication therapy, and have favourable safety. Statements with 70%-100% agreement and "moderate" evidence indicated that, in some patients with IBS, specific probiotics help reduce bloating/distension and improve bowel movement frequency/consistency. CONCLUSIONS This updated review indicates that specific probiotics are beneficial in certain lower GI problems, although many of the new publications did not report benefits of probiotics, possibly due to inclusion of new, less efficacious preparations. Specific probiotics can relieve lower GI symptoms in IBS, prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics and H. pylori eradication therapy, and show favourable safety. This study will help clinicians recommend/prescribe probiotics for specific symptoms.
-
9.
Comprehensive Nutritional and Dietary Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder-A Randomized, Controlled 12-Month Trial.
Adams, JB, Audhya, T, Geis, E, Gehn, E, Fimbres, V, Pollard, EL, Mitchell, J, Ingram, J, Hellmers, R, Laake, D, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
People with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often have significant nutritional deficiencies, metabolic imbalances, and digestive problems. Many studies have previously looked at individual nutrients for ASD. This study was designed to look at the accumulative effect of using a wide range of dietary and nutritional interventions, including vitamin and mineral supplements, essential fatty acids, Epsom salt baths, carnitine, digestive enzymes, and a gluten-free, casein-free, soy-free (HGCSF) diet. The objective being to see if combining multiple interventions for a 12-month period, had greater benefits versus single nutrient interventions, and shorter trials. This US study recruited a wide age range of participants from 3-58yrs because it targeted, and was funded, by family groups of the Autism Society of Greater Phoenix. The study was deliberately single-blinded (meaning the participants knew what they were being given, but the clinical evaluators did not), as it was thought this would be more compelling and lead to less dropouts, especially considering the 12-month timing. In total 67 participants with ASD were recruited and 50 controls. Blood and urine samples were taking at the beginning and end of the study alongside autism severity assessments. Results showed an improvement in nutrient profiles for vitamins, minerals, fatty acids and carnitine alongside a significant decrease in homocysteine. There was an improvement in non-verbal IG test and cognitive function, and gastro-intestinal symptoms. There were no significant differences in complete blood count, blood chemistry panels or markers for inflammatory C-reactive protein (CRP). There was no change to BMI. Three exceptional cases of improvement were recorded in the control group and made into case studies highlighting improved physical strength and ability to walk, and resolution of urinary issues and pica eating disorder. Because it was single blinded there may be some ‘placebo effect’ but overall the researchers conclude that the study demonstrates how interventions can be safely and effectively implemented in families, with minimal adverse effect. And that combined nutrient and diet interventions should be considered for use in clinical practice.
Abstract
This study involved a randomized, controlled, single-blind 12-month treatment study of a comprehensive nutritional and dietary intervention. Participants were 67 children and adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) ages 3-58 years from Arizona and 50 non-sibling neurotypical controls of similar age and gender. Treatment began with a special vitamin/mineral supplement, and additional treatments were added sequentially, including essential fatty acids, Epsom salt baths, carnitine, digestive enzymes, and a healthy gluten-free, casein-free, soy-free (HGCSF) diet. There was a significant improvement in nonverbal intellectual ability in the treatment group compared to the non-treatment group (+6.7 ± 11 IQ points vs. -0.6 ± 11 IQ points, p = 0.009) based on a blinded clinical assessment. Based on semi-blinded assessment, the treatment group, compared to the non-treatment group, had significantly greater improvement in autism symptoms and developmental age. The treatment group had significantly greater increases in EPA, DHA, carnitine, and vitamins A, B2, B5, B6, B12, folic acid, and Coenzyme Q10. The positive results of this study suggest that a comprehensive nutritional and dietary intervention is effective at improving nutritional status, non-verbal IQ, autism symptoms, and other symptoms in most individuals with ASD. Parents reported that the vitamin/mineral supplements, essential fatty acids, and HGCSF diet were the most beneficial.
-
10.
Bifidobacterium bifidum YIT 10347 fermented milk exerts beneficial effects on gastrointestinal discomfort and symptoms in healthy adults: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Gomi, A, Yamaji, K, Watanabe, O, Yoshioka, M, Miyazaki, K, Iwama, Y, Urita, Y
Journal of dairy science. 2018;101(6):4830-4841
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Probiotics have been found to have beneficial effects in adults with functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, however little evidence exists regarding its effects on healthy adults. The aim of this prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was to clarify the beneficial effects of Bifidobacterium bifidum (B bifidum) on gastric symptoms in 100 healthy Japanese adults who experience temporary GI symptoms. Participants were randomised to consume active fermented milk or placebo milk matched for colour, taste and packaging daily for four weeks and various qualitative and quantitative measurements were assessed. This trial found the group consuming B bifidum experienced significantly better relief from upper GI symptoms compared with the placebo group. These findings suggest daily consumption of milk fermented with B bifidum helps relive GI discomfort and symptoms in healthy adults with no risk of side effects. Based on these results, the authors conclude fermented milk drinks can be recommended to patients who experience temporary GI pain.
Abstract
In a preliminary open-label trial by our group, Bifidobacterium bifidum YIT 10347 (YIT10347) relieved gastric symptoms in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Hence, in this study, we investigated the effects of YIT10347 on gastrointestinal symptoms in healthy adults. In this prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (UMIN000024654), 100 healthy Japanese adults were randomly assigned to a YIT10347 group or placebo group and consumed 100 mL of YIT10347-fermented milk or placebo fermented milk, respectively, every day for 4 wk. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated by using the modified Frequency Scale for Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (m-FSSG) and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) as primary endpoints. Mental symptoms, quality of life, salivary stress markers, and gastric emptying were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Effectiveness and safety were analyzed in a per-protocol set (YIT10347 group, n = 39; placebo group, n = 40) and full analysis set (YIT10347 group, n = 50; placebo group, n = 50), respectively. In the m-FSSG evaluation, the YIT10347 group had a significantly higher relief rate of postprandial discomfort and greater changes in postprandial epigastric pain score from baseline than the placebo group. In the GSRS evaluation, the YIT10347 group had significantly higher relief rates of overall gastrointestinal symptoms, upper gastrointestinal symptoms, flatus, and diarrhea than the placebo group. We detected no significant differences in scores or relief rates of mental symptoms and quality of life, a salivary stress marker, or gastric emptying between the 2 groups. No severe adverse events associated with test beverage consumption were observed in either group. These findings suggest that daily consumption of YIT10347-fermented milk exerts beneficial effects on gastrointestinal discomfort and symptoms such as postprandial discomfort and epigastric pain in healthy adults.